There is great expectation about the development of the plugin and also a certain frustration about the delay of the releases and also the time of answer of the questions.
ACF has more than one million active installations. Pilist a little over ten thousand.
ACF has a PRO version, paid, which costs $ 25.00 site or $ 100.00 for unlimited sites.
Everyone who uses frameworks is also developers having software or code as revenue generating activities. We know the importance of making a recipe from that. Without revenue the business does not become sustainable and priorities are defined having this parameter as decisive factor.
I think it’s time to consider a version 1.0 of the piklist as a paid option, taking priority over support.
Affordable values ​​could be considered and additionally donations that could support the continuity of the project.
This will require involvement from both sides.
You did a good job, but just compliments are not enough.
On the other hand the framework must have equivalent resources with other frameworks existing in the market.
Many are users of the ACF, in the migration, or better in the construction of the same system in Piklist it is desirable that the same effects are reproduced.
Software timelines are really hard to predict. Usually take longer than desired.
Let us know the intent of the project. Many go with their eyes, waiting for this definition. It is the time that passes that defines us the expectation and the frustration.